SEO Blogs

Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts

April 17th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

There has been plenty of discussion in the blogosphere about blogs and search engine optimization (SEO). Google in particular seems to love blogs. Blogs are rich in content, heavily linked, with links that tend to be contextual, and without much in the way of code bloat or gratuitous flash animation. In short, blogs are search engine friendly out-of-the-box.

But what about SEO’ing a podcast, the blog’s newest cousin?

Podcasting (where anyone can become an Internet radio talk show host or DJ) presents unique opportunities to the marketer/content producer that blogging does not. I expound on this a bit more in my recent MarketingProfs article but the benefits of podcasting from an SEO standpoint wouldn’t seem as obvious. Podcasts are usually audio content, so you don’t get all this rich textual content that the search engine spiders can snarf up. You also don’t get the rich inter-linking that happens with blogs because you can’t embed clickable URLs throughout your MP3 files.

Nonetheless, I believe you can SEO your podcasts. Here’s how:

  1. Come up with a name for your podcast show that is rich with relevant heavily searched-on keywords.
  2. Make sure your MP3 files have really good ID3 tags ?Į rich with relevant keywords. ID3V2 even supports comment and URL fields. The major search engines may not pick up the ID3 tags now, but they will! And besides, there are specialty engines and software tools that already do.
  3. Synopsize each podcast show in text and blog that. Put your most important keywords as high up in the blog post as possible but still keep it readable and interesting.
  4. Encourage those who link directly to your MP3 file to also link to your blog post about the podcast.
  5. Consider using a transcription service to transcribe your podcast or at least excerpts of it for use as search engine fodder. Break the transcript up into sections. Make sure each section is on a separate web page and each separate web page has a great keyword-rich title relating to that segment of the podcast. And, of course, link to the podcast MP3 from those web pages. There are many transcription services out there, where you can just email them the MP3 file or give them an URL and they send you back a Word document. Here’s a partial list of transcription services .
  6. Submit your podcast site to podcast directories and search engines such as audio.weblogs.com.
  7. Let people in your industry, such as bloggers and the media, know that you have a podcast because podcasting is quite new and novel. It will be more newsworthy and linkworthy than just another blog in your industry.
  8. Don’t just get up on your soapbox. Have conversations with others, in the form of recorded phone interviews, and podcast those as well. Pick people who have great reputations on the web and great PageRank scores, and ask that they link to your site and to your podcast summary page.

This isn’t meant to be a comprehensive list of tactics. It is simply meant as a catalyst for creative thinking. SEO, in particular the link building aspect, isn’t about just following a set list of formulae. It is about creatively thinking outside the box and differentiating yourself in ways that make your site eminently more linkworthy than your competitors.

Spread the word: delicious this:Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts digg this:Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts spurl this:Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts furl this:Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts reddit this:Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts Add to Y!:Podcasting and SEO: How to SEO your podcasts

Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science?

Search Engine Room — Sydney, Australia

April 12th, 2005

Panel Moderated by Stephan Spencer

This panel examines the latest trends in Search Engine Optimisation (SEO), focusing on keyword research, management and execution. Learn how to create an effective SEO campaign and attract the right customers to your site.

Spread the word: delicious this:Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science? digg this:Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science? spurl this:Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science? furl this:Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science? reddit this:Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science? Add to Y!:Search Engine Optimisation - Black Art or Sweet Science?

Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo’s Creative Commons Search

April 7th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Yahoo Creative Commons Search home page screenshotYahoo’s just released a very cool new search engine called Yahoo! Creative Commons Search. With it you can search all the Creative Commons licenced content on the web. For those not familiar with Creative Commons, I’ve blogged about it before. In summary, it is an alternative to copyright, where some rights are reserved by the author, but not all. It’s as quick and painless as can be for the author: you simply fill out this form that specifies how you want your material used out in the marketplace and the license is generated to place on your site. For example, your license can require attribution, restrict to only noncommercial use, allow for the creation of derivative works, etc.

There is a wealth of content out there under a liberal Creative Commons licence that will allow you to reuse and repurpose that content in your own projects. But finding that content used to be hard work. (Actually there was previously another way to search, but it wasn’t as comprehensive, and it wasn’t from a major search engine). Now it’s just a search query away, thanks to Yahoo!

I can hear you asking yourself: “That’s all fine and good, but what use will I have with it?” Here are a few ideas to get your creative juices flowing:

  1. Collect interesting articles on a particular topic from different authors, write your own overview/summary to go with it, then assemble it all into an ebook and offer it on your site as a free download.
  2. Take information relating to a particular company that you would like to land as a customer and arrange it into a scrapbook, then post it on your blog and ask readers to contribute to it further. Hopefully the prospective customer will take notice of your initiative and of your interest in them. If not, bring it to their attention. (What a great, new spin on the standard “cold call”!)
  3. Augment your articles, white papers, etc. with excerpted content relevant to the topic you’re covering. For example, if you wrote a white paper about “How Google Works,” add Creative Commons-licensed photos and text descriptions describing their data centers.
  4. Identify keywords that you want to rank well for and create a mini library of Creative Commons-licensed content about that keyword.

These are just a few ideas, and of course you have to abide by the terms of each content-owner’s license. Idea #4, for example, would be considered commercial use if that library of pages were serving as landing pages to get searchers who find you to buy something. IMPORTANT: Don’t just assume that because it showed up in the search results, it’s licensed under Creative Commons. Some plain ol’ copyrighted material will have undoubtedly snuck into the index. No search engine is 100% perfect. I didn’t have time to test it out much myself, but it seems to pass muster with Tara at ResearchBuzz, so it must be pretty good!

An insightful reader on Slashdot commented that it would be brilliant if Yahoo! took the next step and launched a Bittorrent tracker that was limited to Creative Commons licensed content, with a centralized directory-style index. Bittorrent, if you aren’t familiar with it, offers super-fast de-centralized file sharing on a file-by-file basis. It can be used to download legitimate files, like a trial version of a software program or music under a Creative Commons license. To get started, you need to have the Bittorrent software installed on your computer, and you’ll need to have somehow obtained a Torrent file for a particular big file that you want. This Torrent file is tiny, and it contains information about how to connect with others who have parts of the file you want. But where do you find these Torrent files? That’s where a tracker comes in. More on Bittorent later, in a separate post.

With that, I’ll let you get on with using this new Yahoo! engine to “embrace and extend” to your heart’s content.

Oh, by the way… If you want to learn more the fascinating story of copyright law (no, I’m not kidding! The way Larry Lessig tells it, it really IS interesting!), check out Larry Lessig’s speech at OSCON, with audio syncronized with his Powerpoint slides. Larry is the brains behind the Creative Commons and an overall brilliant lawyer/author/blogger/Stanford professor.

Spread the word: delicious this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search digg this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search spurl this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search furl this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search reddit this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search Add to Y!:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search

Search Engine Optimization Teleconference

April 5th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

In this teleseminar, Netconcepts’ founder Stephan Spencer heads up a 90 minute session with SEO thought leaders: Cam Balzer, Christine Churchill, Mike Grehan, Ammon Johns, Brian Klais, Barry Lloyd, Ian McAnerin, Alan Rimm-Kaufman, Eric Ward and Jill Whalen.

Learn about the rapidly changing world of search, find out where SEO is heading, discover new trends and opportunities, and listen while the panel explores the real issues facing the industry today.

Read the Executive Summary: part 1 and part 2

Download the Transcript: PDF (300 K)

Produced by MarketingProfs.com

 
icon for podpress  SEO Seminar with Leading Experts [105:31m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Spread the word: delicious this:Search Engine Optimization Teleconference digg this:Search Engine Optimization Teleconference spurl this:Search Engine Optimization Teleconference furl this:Search Engine Optimization Teleconference reddit this:Search Engine Optimization Teleconference Add to Y!:Search Engine Optimization Teleconference

Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2

April 5th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Where is SEO heading? What are the trends and new opportunities? And what are the real issues facing the industry?
A panel of 12 experts predict…

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2 digg this:Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2 spurl this:Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2 furl this:Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2 reddit this:Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2 Add to Y!:Thought leaders discuss search engine optimization - Part 2

Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1

April 5th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

The competition is heating up as companies awaken to a universe of marketing opportunities - providing their customers can find them, that is!

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1 digg this:Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1 spurl this:Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1 furl this:Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1 reddit this:Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1 Add to Y!:Thought Leaders discuss Search Engine Optimization - Part 1

RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers?

April 3rd, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

DM News covered a controversial new JupiterResearch report on RSS. The blogosphere was quick to respond. Some of the marketer-bloggers that I hold in high regard ?Į Seth Godin, Bill Flitter, Rok Hrastnik, and Rick Turoczy ?Į weighed in with their thoughts. Others chimed in too, as chronicled here. Some even trashed DM News, like in this thread at Threadwatch.org ?Į unfairly in my opinion (Remember the expression “Don’t shoot the messenger.” DM News after all, is only reporting on the JupiterResearch study and its conclusions.). Here’s my reaction to some of the points made in the article/study:

“RSS is not well suited to promotional-offer-oriented content because it does not offer the targeting and personalization capabilities of e-mail, the report said.”

Having been part of the team that developed an email marketing service (namely, GravityMail) from the ground up and honed it over a number of years, with extensive targeting and personalization capabilities built-in, I argue that you CAN target and personalize RSS to the same or similar degree. In fact, you can personalize/customize based on each subscriber’s demographics, psychographics, clickographics, or a combination of all of the above. In order to do so, of course, you’d need to be providing unique feed URLs to each subscriber, not a generic feed URL like www.mycompany.com/myrssfeed.xml. There’s no reason why you can’t collect information from each subscriber before and/or after they subscribe, and then use that information to deliver laser-targeted promotional offers. It’s also feasible to collect data on viewing and click behavior, then use that information to fine-tune the offers over time. You can measure the encoded content reads in RSS items like you would measure HTML opens in email campaigns (both done using “web bugs”), and you can measure the clickthroughs through clicktracked URLs embedded in the feed. More on this here. As Rok notes, out-of-the-box solutions for RSS personalization and targeting already exist: e.g. ByPass, RSS AutoPublisher, and SimpleFeed.

“However, even for use as a supplemental or alternative e-mail broadcast tool, the adoption of RSS for marketing purposes will remain low during the next 24 months.”

My instinct tells me this prediction is going to be waaaay off the mark. RSS adoption of poised to explode. It will be driven by popular web browsers like Internet Explorer and email clients like Outlook shipping with support for RSS built right in, which in my opinion isn’t just inevitable but also imminent. Robert Scoble, technical evangelist at Microsoft and A-list blogger, riffs on his blog: “if you do a marketing site and you don’t have an RSS feed today you should be fired. I’ll say it again. You should be fired if you do a marketing site without an RSS feed. Saying that RSS is only for geeks today is like saying in 1998 that the Web was only for geeks.” Strong words coming from someone in the Microsoft camp as influential as Scoble.

“However, RSS publishing still faces many hurdles: measuring traffic at least on a subscriber level is nearly impossible to do, which will relegate RSS to a broadcast marketing tool in the near term.”

This claim from the study floored me. Measuring traffic at the subscriber level is anything but impossible. Again, simply provide unique feed URLs to each subscriber and you can track track viewing through web bugs and clicking through clicktracked links. Rok points out some services that offer traffic measurement on a subscriber level: SyndicateIQ, RSS AutoPublisher, SimpleFeed, Nooked, and Feedburner.

“RSS could possibly become as cluttered and confusing to consumers as the e-mail marketing channel is currently”

Not sure where the authors of the study are heading here. I presume they are referring to the spam problem. But email and RSS are quite different technologies in regards to susceptibility to spam. RSS is unspammable: no spammer can infiltrate someone else’s RSS feed, and no spammer can cause an RSS feed that’s full of spam to appear on a user’s subscription list. Perhaps they are referring to advertising in RSS feeds? I’m no fan of ads in RSS feeds, but that’s not spam. RSS is opt-in. If a content producer wants to subsidize the costs of producing that content by taking on advertisers who then add unwelcome noise to that content producer’s RSS feed, well removing the feed from my reader is just a click away.

I do think the overriding message from the article and the study is valid: when it comes to RSS, marketers (including your competitors) just don’t get it, and probably won’t, anytime soon. This comes through loud and clear from Jupiter’s survey findings that 45% of marketers have no plans to deploy RSS to supplement e-mail, and only 5% are currently doing so. So, ponder how you can best leverage this opportunity as the giants in your industry sleep!

Spread the word: delicious this:RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers? digg this:RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers? spurl this:RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers? furl this:RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers? reddit this:RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers? Add to Y!:RSS: Hot or Not for Marketers?

An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye

March 13th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Doug Kaye, founder of IT Conversations, is one of the true pioneers in the area of podcasting. His IT Conversations site offers a large array of podcasts from many of the top-most thought leaders in information technology. Listen in on Doug and I discuss podcasting — its history, potential applications, challenges, and best successes to date. This podcast was done in conjunction with my article on podcasting for marketers, soon to be published on MarketingProfs.com.

Spread the word: delicious this:An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye digg this:An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye spurl this:An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye furl this:An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye reddit this:An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye Add to Y!:An audio interview with podcasting pioneer Doug Kaye

Talkin ’bout RSS… on the Chris Pirillo Show

March 11th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Want to listen to me rant and rave about the power of RSS as a content delivery channel for search marketers? That was a rhetorical question. Frankly, who wouldn’t! ;-) So now you get your chance, on my interview on the Chris Pirillo Show, which was just podcasted today. Chris interviewed me last week at Search Engine Strategies. Have a listen.

Spread the word: delicious this:Talkin 'bout RSS... on the Chris Pirillo Show digg this:Talkin 'bout RSS... on the Chris Pirillo Show spurl this:Talkin 'bout RSS... on the Chris Pirillo Show furl this:Talkin 'bout RSS... on the Chris Pirillo Show reddit this:Talkin 'bout RSS... on the Chris Pirillo Show Add to Y!:Talkin 'bout RSS... on the Chris Pirillo Show

New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click

March 10th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

aggregate mapI found the eyetracking study from Enquiro and Did-It unveiled last week at Search Engine Strategies and covered in Search Day fascinating. The aggregate heat map shown on the right (larger version here) shows where participants focused their eyes (and their attention) the most. As you can see, the first listing not only drew the most attention; the full listing was read more fully from left to right, than other listings.

Visibility drops the further down the search results you go, and clickthroughs drop even more markedly (as you can see from the graphs below). This got me thinking about Zipf’s Law. Zipf’s Law is applicable to Top Ten Lists, as Seth Godin explains, perhaps Zipf’s Law might be applicable to the SERPs (search engine results pages) too? (In general terms, Zipf’s Law states that being #1 is much, much better than being #2 which is much, much better than being #3 and so on. So dominating a Top 10 list is critical.) Although these graphs don’t follow Zipf’s Law exactly, nonetheless given this data I’d consider it foolish to be complacent if your search listings are not at the very top of the SERPs.

What is it about searchers that makes them so blind to relevant results further down the page? Is this due to the “implied endorsement” effect, where searchers tend to simply trust Google to point them to the right thing? Or is it just the way humans are wired, to make snap decisions, as Malcolm Gladwell insightfully explains in his new book, Blink? According to the study, 72% of searchers click on the first link of interest, whereas 25.5% read all listings first, then decide. My guess is that both effects (”implied endorsement” and “rapid cognition”) play a role in searcher behavior.

A few other important take-aways from the study:

  1. 6/7 (85%) of searchers click on natural (”organic”) results (not 60/40 as the search engines and PPC (pay-per-click) vendors would have you believe).
  2. The top 4 sponsored slots are equivalent in views to being ranked at #7 - #10 natural.
  3. (corollary to #2): This means if you need to make a business case for natural search, then (assuming you can attain at least #3 rank in natural for the same keywords you bid on) natural search could be worth two to three times your PPC results.

In all, a superb research study. Great job Did-It, Enquiro, and EyeTools!

line graph of visibility
line graph of clickthroughs

Spread the word: delicious this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click digg this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click spurl this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click furl this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click reddit this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click Add to Y!:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click

Pages (60): « First ... « 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 » ... Last »


Related tags

and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or

Newsletter

Web marketing virtuoso Stephan Spencer, shares a wealth of emarketing experience and hard-hitting, practical advice in our monthly newsletter. It's full of valuable insights...You should subscribe.








Latest posts
Latest comments


Contact Us

HEADQUARTERS
2820 Walton Commons West, Suite 123
Madison, WI 53718 USA
Phone: (608) 285-6600
Toll-free: 888 207-1109

REGIONAL OFFICE
36 Anzac Rd., Browns Bay
Auckland, New Zealand
Phone: (+64) 9 476-4601
infodesk@netconcepts.com